Field Rotations … and paradigm implications on the concept of gravity.
As you peer into the universe to estimate an apparent infinite outer edge and probe at the seemingly endless small … is rotation the common found? Has the role of rotation been given proper consideration?
If indeed curvature in space is a formative of rotation through space-time and rotation is responsible for the prominent role hypothesized … is it possible that the energy of rotation that exists in the universe through angular momentum and related dynamics provides a corollary to the hypothesized black energy and black matter that is thought to exist?
A dynamic field rotation is not what is perceived at any one instant in time, it is the space-time structure that occurs through time.
Ether … black energy … black matter … rotation through space-time …?
27 November 2011
16 March 2011
Rotational Induction . The Origin of Mass?
An alternate view of Gravity ...
If mass did not exist in the early universe, how is it possible that the mechanism of gravity could possibly be attraction?
Considering that in the early 19th century Pierre Simon de Laplace analyzed the gravitational field surrounding a sphere of mass m and radius r noted that the square of the escape velocity from the surface of the sphere equals 2Gm/r, i.e. v^2=2Gm/r. The reasoning followed that if the velocity equals the speed of light, c, then light itself cannot escape from the sphere which is then invisible, i.e. c^2=2Gm/r. This provided the basis for the concept of the black hole later elaborated by Einstein.
The fact that gravity’s constant, G, can be extracted from the formula, i.e. G=c^2 r/2m gives indication that gravity, speed of light, the focus of circular form and mass may all be related and intertwined and that the proportions flowing through gravity may be involved in establishing the ultimate speed of light.
Recognizing that velocity and the speed of light are values of time and motion gives rise to the notion that gravity may be the product of a dynamic mechanism and that gravity’s constant just might be the ratio of what exists at any instant in time to the actual structure that exists through time, i.e. a result of dynamic dimensional interplay.
Over the years I have given extensive thought to this idea and have come to the conclusion that gravity is more likely a mechanism of induction in lieu of attraction. I feel the richness of thought this theory provokes deserves further exploration.
In a violent event, i.e. the big bang that propelled whatever existed at the time towards expansion and disorder, what could possibly be moving through all this, with focus, gathering remnants, the smallest moving and frozen in time at the speed of light, into collections of order eventually resulting in life?. Could it possibly be rotation? The clues appear everywhere.
The intent of this writing is to broaden the discussion.
"We dance 'round in a ring and suppose, but the secret sits in the middle and knows." Robert Frost
If mass did not exist in the early universe, how is it possible that the mechanism of gravity could possibly be attraction?
Considering that in the early 19th century Pierre Simon de Laplace analyzed the gravitational field surrounding a sphere of mass m and radius r noted that the square of the escape velocity from the surface of the sphere equals 2Gm/r, i.e. v^2=2Gm/r. The reasoning followed that if the velocity equals the speed of light, c, then light itself cannot escape from the sphere which is then invisible, i.e. c^2=2Gm/r. This provided the basis for the concept of the black hole later elaborated by Einstein.
The fact that gravity’s constant, G, can be extracted from the formula, i.e. G=c^2 r/2m gives indication that gravity, speed of light, the focus of circular form and mass may all be related and intertwined and that the proportions flowing through gravity may be involved in establishing the ultimate speed of light.
Recognizing that velocity and the speed of light are values of time and motion gives rise to the notion that gravity may be the product of a dynamic mechanism and that gravity’s constant just might be the ratio of what exists at any instant in time to the actual structure that exists through time, i.e. a result of dynamic dimensional interplay.
Over the years I have given extensive thought to this idea and have come to the conclusion that gravity is more likely a mechanism of induction in lieu of attraction. I feel the richness of thought this theory provokes deserves further exploration.
In a violent event, i.e. the big bang that propelled whatever existed at the time towards expansion and disorder, what could possibly be moving through all this, with focus, gathering remnants, the smallest moving and frozen in time at the speed of light, into collections of order eventually resulting in life?. Could it possibly be rotation? The clues appear everywhere.
The intent of this writing is to broaden the discussion.
"We dance 'round in a ring and suppose, but the secret sits in the middle and knows." Robert Frost
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
